Jump to content

Tim Berry is pitching for Bowie tonight.


weams

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>1-2-3 first inning for Tim Berry and he needed only 10 pitches. You can listen to the game live on 1430AM WNAV</p>— Bowie Baysox (@BowieBaysox) <a href="

">April 17, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

.

Excellent play by Schoop (Sharlon) on defense to THROW BEHIND THE RUNNER after he had hit a single to nail him after he had rounded the bag.

Somewhat reminiscent of 2 years ago when Machado picked up a slow roller down the 3rd baseline, faked the throw to first, and turned around and nailed the runner rounding 3rd base with a throw to Hardy (who was covering the bag on the play.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

Berry hurt his own cause in the 4th inning.

On an easy double play ball right back to the pitcher that would have ended the inning, he threw the ball low to second base, and they only got one.

The following batter hit an RBI-double before Berry got the next hitter on a groundout to end the inning.

It could have been worse, though. As mentioned before, an excellent defensive play by Sharlon Schoop picked a batter off of first base right after he led the inning off with a single. The RubberDucks actually got 4 hits that inning (a double and 3 singles), and netted only a single run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

TIMOTHY BERRY O (vs. AA-Akron, 4/17)

IP:. 6

H:o 5 (1 Double, 4 Singles)

R:O 1

BB: 2

SO: 3

Pitches: 87 (55 Strikes, 32 Balls)

2014 ERA: 1.00 (AA-Bowie)

PITCHES BY INNING

*****************

10 (91 Strikes, 11 Balls)

14 (10 Strikes, 41 Balls)

20 (10 Strikes, 10 Balls)

24 (15 Strikes, 91 Balls)

71 (51 Strikes, 21 Balls)

12 (61 Strikes, 61 Balls)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

TIMOTHY BERRY O (vs. AA-Akron, 4/17)

IP:. 6

H:o 5 (1 Double, 4 Singles)

R:O 1

BB: 2

SO: 3

Pitches: 87 (55 Strikes, 32 Balls)

2014 ERA: 1.00 (AA-Bowie)

PITCHES BY INNING

*****************

10 (91 Strikes, 11 Balls)

14 (10 Strikes, 41 Balls)

20 (10 Strikes, 10 Balls)

24 (15 Strikes, 91 Balls)

71 (51 Strikes, 21 Balls)

12 (61 Strikes, 61 Balls)

Berry is done for the night. These are his final numbers.

The Baysox just pushed 2 runs across the plate in the bottom half of the 6th, so he leaves the game on the winning end (not that he cares about that.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

TIMOTHY BERRY O (vs. AA-Erie, 4/22)

IP:. 6

H:o 3 (1 Double, 2 Singles)

R:O 1

BB: 1

SO: 4

Pitches: 96 (60 Strikes, 36 Balls)

2014 ERA: 1.13 (AA-Bowie)

PITCHES BY INNING

*****************

14 (81 Strikes, 61 Balls)

18 (14 Strikes, 41 Balls)

13 (81 Strikes, 51 Balls)

10 (71 Strikes, 31 Balls)

30 (16 Strikes, 14 Balls)

11 (71 Strikes, 41 Balls)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berry and Wright should at least cost controlled members of the bullpen from 2015-2021. Let that sink in. That's the floor.

I can't agree with you on that one. The floor for any pitching prospect is labrum surgery --> out of baseball. TINSTAAPP.

Moreover, even for those who dodge injury, a bullpen "floor" isn't really true. Wright and Berry are on the same age/league trajectory: Berry in 23 in AA, Wright in 24 in AAA. I don't have AAA stats for pitching prospects yet, but I can tell you that 23 year old starting pitchers in AA become successful major leaguers (ie, >200 IP and >1 WAR) about 19% of the time. About 58% make the majors for at least a cup of coffee.

I don't have breakdowns yet for the stats put up, so that 19% is for every 23-year-old starter in AA. I have every hope that Berry and Wright will both be successful, but one of the things I've learned from my prospect project is that the concept of a prospect "floor" is just flat out wrong for all except the very best of the very best position prospects only. Almost ANY prospect can get injured, lose his command, not adjust to major league pitching, or just plain suck.

One thing you are correct about is that Berry and Wright are likely destined for the bullpen. "Star" pitchers are almost never relievers (I believe there were only 2-3 relief "stars" in my dataset out of several hundred major leaguers) and 23-yo AA players almost never become stars: the rate is only 2.3%. Some "successful" players are starters, of course, but the odds are good that Berry and Wright will be relief pitchers in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

TIMOTHY BERRY O (vs. AA-Harrisburg, 4/27)

IP:. 4

H:o 9 (3 Home Runs, 1 Triple, 2 Doubles, 3 Singles)

R:O 9

BB: 1

SO: 3

Pitches: 69 (40 Strikes, 29 Balls)

2014 ERA: 3.86 (AA-Bowie)

PITCHES BY INNING

*****************

10 (81 Strikes, 21 Balls)

10 (81 Strikes, 21 Balls)

30 (17 Strikes, 13 Balls)

19 (71 Strikes, 12 Balls)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Weston had his third straight solid outing for Bowie, allowing one run in 3.1 innings.  He’s carrying a 1.74 ERA at Bowie since his promotion.  
    • Bradfield has shown some signs of heating up since returning from the IL.  Tonight, he singled and tripled in 5 PA to raise his BA to .247 and his OPS to .715.   Not where you’d want them but moving north a bit in May.  He also stole a base, but then got picked off 2B. 
    • I think a combination of announcers overusing the narrative, and the playoff sweep leaving a sour taste. I still like the streak though. 
    • In theory the team could go 4 series in a row where they win one out of three games. On the flipside a team could win eight out of twelve games, but have a three game sweep mixed in this stretch. Which team is actually doing better the one that hasn’t been swept or the other playing .666 winning percentage ball.  The streak is a good indicator, but I’ll take a deep playoff run with a few three game losing streaks mixed in over the course of a season. 
    • I think it'd be a cool record for the club to have...why so much indifference? 
    • Exceeding expectations: Irvin.  I said before the season I thought he'd have a monster season but had no idea it'd be like this. Gunnar:  Thought he'd be more of the same as last year, maybe a bit of a sophomore slump but he's MVP level even with his recent skid.  His defense looks legit, too.  He's making the leap in year 2 to superstar player. Adley:  Hitting for a higher average than I would have expected, now it looks like the power is coming around, too. Cowser:  Low bar to hurdle here, didn't know what to expect/low expectations help him here.   O'Hearn:  Thought he'd still be good but not this good. Mounty:  Glad to have been wrong about him after being all over him last year.  His defense is excellent, I think he'll be in the running for a GG this year. Westburg:  1.8 bWAR already, had no idea this was coming.  Looking like an invaluable member of the team moving forward.  Steady, quiet excellence. Mateo:  Thought he might not even have a spot on the team this spring but his defense is electric at 2nd base.  Would like to see more steals from him, though. Kremer:  He's been great. I don't know how his bWAR is -0.2, 46 innings of a 1.022 WHIP has to be worth more than that.  I thought he'd be solid, I didn't think he'd be this good. Suarez:  Out of nowhere for 23 innings of 0.913 WHIP.  Amazing. Akin:  I'll get some flak for this but I don't care.  I didn't expect much from him, so anything positive is a step in the right direction.  1.056 WHIP out of the pen, I'll take that all day.  21 strikeouts in 18 innings.  Remains to be seen if he can do this all year, but I think he's fully healthy and back to throwing strikes.   Failing to meet expectations Jackson Holliday:  But I'm not upset about it.   Kimbrel:  But of course. Cedric:  This hurts because I love the guy but he looks awful at the plate.  He's still somewhat indispensable because of his range in CF but the second half of last year was bad and it's even worse this year.   Tony Santander:  Almost don't want to put him here because he's a notorious slow starter so expectations probably should have been adjusted.   Cano:  Low on the list here because I expected him to be not as effective this year as he was last year.  But he's a good candidate for a roller coaster appearance and he's bailed himself out with some outstanding defensive plays.  1.328 WHIP isn't ideal for someone in his spot. I'm not gonna put injured players on here so that spares Hays and G-Rod from making the failing to meet expectations list.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...